Hi all,
While going through numutils.c I found the following thing:
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ pg_ltoa(int32 value, char *a)
* Avoid problems with the most negative integer not being representable
* as a positive integer.
*/
- if (value == (-2147483647 - 1))
+ if (value == PG_INT32_MIN)
{
memcpy(a, "-2147483648", 12);
return;
Attached is a patch. The interesting part is that pg_lltoa is not
missing the check on PG_INT64_MIN.
Regards,
--
Michael
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c
index c198619..362098e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ pg_ltoa(int32 value, char *a)
* Avoid problems with the most negative integer not being representable
* as a positive integer.
*/
- if (value == (-2147483647 - 1))
+ if (value == PG_INT32_MIN)
{
memcpy(a, "-2147483648", 12);
return;
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
