On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> I'll run with -1 once the current (longer) run has finished. > > Just for the record, were any of the other results purporting to be > with the feature "off" also actually running with the feature set > for its fastest possible timeout?
Mine were testing something else entirely, so I didn't touch old_snapshot_threshold at all. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
