On 2016-04-13 11:20:19 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-04-13 14:16:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Good point, it would be absolutely duplicative. What I'd suggest, > > actually, is that we convert this to the same info as what elog > > provides (file+line+function name). > > Heh, I was wondering the same aftering sending the last email. Will do > that then.
Pushed. Let's see what pademelon says... -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
