On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:00:57AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I can think of a number of relatively easy ways to address this: > > 1) Just zap (or issue?) all pending flush requests when getting an > > smgrinval/smgrclosenode > > 2) Do 1), but filter for the closed relnode > > 3) Actually handle the case of the last open segment not being > > RELSEG_SIZE properly in _mdfd_getseg() - mdnblocks() does so. > > > > I'm kind of inclined to do both 3) and 1).
Andres, you own the underlying open item, right? Do you plan to implement this fix you have outlined? If so, when? > #3 seems like it's probably about 15 years overdue, so let's do that anyway. > > I don't quite understand why #1 fixes the problem - not because I > doubt you, but just because I haven't studied it much. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
