Hi, Pursuant to promises made in Brussels a couple of months ago, I set up a machine to run and expose the "make coverage" report under "make check-world". Some people have already heard about this.
I would like to collect ideas on how to improve this. For example * Should we run something other than "make check-world" As far as I know, that covers all or almost all the tests we have; are there things that we should have and are not running? If so, how do we go about enabling them? * buildfarm doesn't run make check-world for reasons of its own. Maybe we should run exactly what a typical buildfarm animal runs? That way, the coverage report would be closer to what we're actually verifying. * Should we keep historical reports to study how numbers change in time? Maybe save one report a week or something like that? * Any other comments? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.linkedin.com/in/alvherre -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
