On 04/19/2016 01:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Now, I have produced two patches:
- 0001-Support-for-VS-2015-locale-hack.patch, which makes use of
__crt_locale_data_public in ucrt/corecrt.h. This is definitely an ugly
hack, though I am coming to think that this may be the approach that
would us the less harm, and that's closer to what is done for VS 2012
and 2013.
- 0001-Support-for-VS-2015-getlocaleinfoex.patch, which make use of
GetLocaleInfoEx, this requires us to lower a bit the support grid for
Windows, basically that's throwing support for XP if compilation is
done with VS 2015.
Based on my tests, both are working with short and long local names,
testing via initdb --locale.
The first patch is actually not what I wanted to send. Here are the
correct ones...
This thread seems to have stalled. I thought we were going to consider
these patches for 9.6. Should we simply push them to see what the
buildfarm thinks?
We need to choose first which one we'd like to have, it would be great
to get some input from Andrew or even Magnus here who I thought would
get the last word.
trying to make some more time to spend on this. I hope to in the next
day or two.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
