On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> You don't want to remove buggy code that is currently unused simply >>> because it might be useful to have that functionality in the future? >> >> No, I don't want to remove code that somebody thinks we should fix >> instead of removing on your say-so. > > I don't think that that's an efficient use of anyone's time. If > somebody proposes a patch with functionality that needs to merge HLL > states, then they can add an implementation at that time.
Peter, if there is consensus on this patch, I will commit it. If there isn't, I won't. If you don't like that, sorry. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
