On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:25:21AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Here's the features I can imagine being worth major backwards > compatibility breaks: ... > 5. Transparent upgrade-in-place (i.e. allowing 10.2 to use 10.1's tables > without pg_upgrade or other modification).
Technically, this is exactly what pg_upgrade does. I think what you really mean is for the backend binary to be able to read the system tables and WAL files of the old clusters --- something I can't see us implementing anytime soon. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
