On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > As its committer, I tend to agree about reverting that feature. Craig > was just posting some more patches, and I have the pg_recvlogical > changes here (--endpos) which after some testing are not quite looking > ready to go -- plus we still have to write the actual Perl test scripts > that would use it. Taken together, this is now looking to me a bit > rushed, so I prefer to cut my losses here and revert the patch so that > we can revisit it for 9.7.
I think it's a positive development that we can take this attitude to reverting patches. It should not be seen as a big personal failure, because it isn't. Stigmatizing reverts incentivizes behavior that leads to bad outcomes. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
