On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Hmm, I had decided that wasn't worth listing, but now I can't think >> why :-(. Will add it. > > Oh, now I see why it's not here: it was back-patched into 9.5, so it > will not be a new feature in 9.6.0. It will be listed in the 9.5.3 > release notes, instead.
I was really hoping that the OpenSSL bugfix patch would receive the same treatment (commit 7c7d4fddab82dc756d8caa67b1b31fcdde355aab). Should I take its inclusion here in the 9.6 release notes as portending a backpatch never happening? There seems to be a lack of urgency about it, and given that it's moderately complicated, that tends to mean it will keep getting put off. I did notice that you have an sgml comment about it, but the wording isn't optimistic. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
