On 3 May 2016 at 16:10, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> While this in itself is about a two-line fix, after reviewing >> 137805f89acb3611 I'm pretty unhappy that it got committed at all. >> I think this obvious bug is a good sign that it wasn't ready. >> Other unfinished aspects like invention of an undocumented GUC >> don't leave a good impression either. >> > > The GUC is meant to make testing during development easier. I haven't > realized it got committed, but I assume Simon plans to remove it before the > final release. Yes, the GUC was for testing, as mentioned on the commit message. > Can't check right now with Simon, though, as he's is out of office this > week. > Am back and reading. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
