On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Here's a rebased version. I remember why I didn't call the column > "offset" (as Michael complained about upthread), it's a keyword...
Oh, an old patch resurrected from the dead... Reading again the patch + * Increase number of initilized slots if we didn't reuse a previously + * used one. s/initilized/initialized + Number of backends attached to this segment (1 signals a moribund + entry, 2 signals one user, ...). moribund? Or target for removal. REVOKE ALL .. FROM PUBLIC; REVOKE EXECUTE .. ON FUNCTION FROM PUBLIC; Revoking he execution of those views and their underlying functions would be a good thing I think, this can give hints on the system activity, particularly for DSM segments. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
