On Friday, May 13, 2016, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:05:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Dave Page (dp...@pgadmin.org <javascript:;>) wrote: > > > I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written > > > assuming the first part of the version number is only a single digit. > > > > Let's just go with 2016 instead then. > > > > At least then users would see how old the version they're running is (I > > was just recently dealing with a 8.4 user...). > > We tried, that, "Postgres95". ;-) >
Even better, we're being retro! It's in style! ;) Stephen
