On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> If that were the standard, we'd never have bumped the major version at > all, and would still be on 4.something (or whatever Berkeley was using > when they tossed it over the wall; I'm not too clear on whether there was > ever a 5.x release). I thought the idea was that Berkeley tossed an source tree over the wall with no version number and then the first five releases were Postgres95 0.x, Postgres95 1.0, Postgres95 1.0.1, Postgres95 1.0.2, Postgres95 1.0.9. Then the idea was that PostgreSQL 6.0 was the sixth major release counting those as the first five releases. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
