On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Since we were considering a new VACUUM option, surely this is serious > enough to warrant more than just contrib.
I would like to see us consider the long-term best place for amcheck's functionality at the same time. Ideally, verification would be a somewhat generic operation, with AM-specific code invoked as appropriate. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
