On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 5/20/16 7:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> I guess my first question is whether we have consensus on the release >> into which we should put this. Some people (Noah, among others) >> thought it should wait because we're after feature freeze, while >> others thought we should do it now. If we're going to try to get this >> into 9.6, I'll work on reviewing this sooner rather than later, but if >> we're not going to do that I'm going to postpone dealing with it until >> after we branch. > > > Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and should be > in that release.
Yes, I agree. By the way, the patch completely ignores the fact that some of the modules already had a version bump in the 9.6 development cycle, like pageinpect. You don't need to create a new version script in such cases. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
