В письме от 25 мая 2016 13:25:38 Вы написали: > Teodor Sigaev wrote: > > >This all should me moved behind "access method" abstraction... > > > > +1 relopt_kind should be moved in am, at least. Or removed. > > Hm, but we have tablespace options too, so I'm not sure that using AM as > abstraction level is correct. We will use am for all indexes, and keep all the rest in relopotion.c for non-indexes. May be divided options catalog into sections one section for each kind.
And as I also would like to use this code for dynamic attoptions later, I would like to remove relopt_kind at all. Because it spoils live in that case. -- Nikolay Shaplov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
