On 2016-05-25 14:09:43 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think this is looking at the problem from the wrong angle.  The OP's
> complaint is pretty fair: a 30-second wait for ProcArrayLock is
> horrendous, and if that's actually something that is happening with
> any significant regularity on well-configured systems, we need to fix
> it somehow.

No disagreement there.


> I don't think we can just say "oh, well,
> sometimes the system becomes totally unresponsive for more than 30
> seconds, but we don't care".  We have to care about that.

I don't think anybody was doing that? The first questions on this thread
were about upgrading and retesting...


Andres


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to