On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Agreed -- things like pglogical and BDR rely on background workers to do > their jobs. Many other users of bgworkers have popped up, so I think > it'd be a bad idea if parallel queries are able to monopolize all the > available slots.
That never occurred to me. I'd say it could be a serious problem, that should be fixed promptly. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
