On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:31:44PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > > > If a database with the bloom extension installed is dumped and restored, > > > there's an error with the access method creation: > > > > > > createdb bloomtest > > > psql -c 'CREATE EXTENSION bloom;' bloomtest > > > pg_dump -d bloomtest > ~/tmp/bloom.sql > > > createdb bloomtest2 > > > psql -d bloomtest2 -f ~/tmp/bloom.sql > > > > > > The output of the last command produces: > > > > > > "psql:/home/thom/tmp/bloom.sql:48: ERROR: access method "bloom" already > > > exists" > > > > > > So pg_dump shouldn't be dumping this access method as it's part of the > > > extension. > > > > Stephen, something is smelling wrong in checkExtensionMembership() > > since 5d58999, an access method does not have ACLs and I would have > > expected that when this routine is invoked in > > selectDumpableAccessMethod() the object is not selected as dumpable. > > Yeah, I saw this also and was going to look into it.
[Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.] The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Stephen, since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks. [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.ga447...@tornado.leadboat.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
