Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Michael Paquier
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hmm, so we could solve the complaint by adding an ANALYZE. I'm open to
>>> that; other opinions?
>> We could just enforce work_mem to 64kB and then reset it.
> Or just set up work_mem to a wanted value for the duration of the run
> of psql_crosstab. Attached is my proposal.
I liked the ANALYZE idea better; this seems pretty ad-hoc.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
