On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So I like the idea of centralizing checks in >> RelationAllowsEarlyVacuum, but shouldn't it really be called >> RelationAllowsEarlyPruning? > > Since vacuum calls the pruning function, and not the other way > around, the name you suggest would be technically more correct. > Committed using "Pruning" instead of "Vacuum" in both new macros. > > I have closed the CREATE INDEX versus "snapshot too old" issue in > the "PostgreSQL 9.6 Open Items" Wiki page.
You've still got an early_vacuum_enabled variable name floating around there. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
