On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Tatsuro Yamada <yamada.tats...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > I got mistake to write an e-mail to -hackers on last week. :-< > I should have written this. > > The bug has not fixed by Tom Lane's patch: commit aeb9ae6. > Because I got the same error using tpc-h.
This looks like a different regression.. >>> Today, I try it again by changing max_parallel_workers_per_gather >>> parameter. >>> The result of Q1 is bellow. Is this bug in the Open items on wiki? >> >> I don't see it on the Open Issues list. > > I checked the list, but the bug is not listed. > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.6_Open_Items And the winner is: 04ae11f62e643e07c411c4935ea6af46cb112aa9 is the first bad commit commit 04ae11f62e643e07c411c4935ea6af46cb112aa9 Author: Robert Haas <rh...@postgresql.org> Date: Fri Jun 3 14:27:33 2016 -0400 I am adding that to the list of open items. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
