Josh Berkus wrote: > > > Uh ... do we have a basis for recommending any particular sets of > > > parameters for these different scenarios? This could be a good idea > > > in the abstract, but I'm not sure I know enough to fill in the details. > > Sure. > Mostly-Read database, few users, good hardware, complex queries: > = High shared buffers and sort mem, high geqo and join collapse thresholds, > moderate fsm settings, defaults for WAL. > Same as above with many users and simple queries (webserver) = > same as above, except lower sort mem and higher connection limit > High-Transaction Database = > Moderate shared buffers and sort mem, high FSM settings, increase WAL files > and buffers. > Workstation = > Moderate to low shared buffers and sort mem, moderate FSM, defaults for WAL, > etc. > Low-Impact server = current defaults, more or less.
Okay, but there should probably be one more, called "Benchmark". The real problem is what values to use for it. :-) -- Kevin Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
