On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 3. In https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/25521.1465837...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>> Tom proposed adding a GUC to set the minimum relation size required
>>> for consideration of parallelism.
>
>> I have posted a patch for this upthread [3].  The main thing to verify is
>> the default value of guc.
>
> I'll review and push this patch, unless Robert or somebody else has
> already started on it.

Great, it's all yours.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to