On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item ("fix >>>> possible confusion between subqueries and subplans"). >> >>> This open item comes with a patch submitted by Tom Lane. If Tom wants >>> me to review and (if no problems are found) commit that patch to >>> resolve this open item, I'm willing to do that. But generally I don't >>> commit patches submitted by other committers unless that person and I >>> have agreed on it in advance, which is not currently the case here. >> >>> Tom, do you want to commit this, or do you want me to handle it, or >>> something else? >> >> I was not sure if you'd agreed that the patch was correct, and in any >> case I thought you wanted to fold it into the upperrel consider_parallel >> patch. I feel no great need to commit it myself, if that's what you >> meant. > > OK, I'll set aside some time for further review and either commit it > or send an update by COB Thursday US time. >
I had couple of questions [1] related to that patch. See if you find those as relevant? [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2ByGs-onuJDy%2BTTqnrnT0hty_QQPC1GipS%2Bce-W3872QQ%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers