Kouhei Kaigai <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> writes: > I tried to build the latest master branch just after the switch from > REL9_5_STABLE and "make clean", however, repl_gram.c was not cleaned > up correctly. So, my problem is that repl_gram.l was the latest version, > but compiler saw the repl_gram.c generated based on the v9.5 source. > ... > Probably, we have to add explicit cleanup of these auto-generated files > on Makefiles.
"make clean" absolutely should NOT remove that file; not even "make distclean" should, because we ship it in tarballs. Likewise for the other bison product files you mention, as well as a boatload of other derived files. If you want to checkout a different release branch in the same working directory, I'd suggest "make maintainer-clean" or "git clean -dfx" first. (Personally I don't ever do that --- it's much easier to maintain a separate workdir per branch.) Having said that, switching to a different branch should have resulted in repl_gram.l being updated by git, and thereby acquiring a new file mod date; so I don't understand why make wouldn't have chosen to rebuild repl_gram.c. Can you provide a reproducible sequence that makes this happen? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers