On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:00:45AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >>> This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly > >>> send > >>> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent > >>> status > >>> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > >>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.ga447...@tornado.leadboat.com > >> > >> IIRC Kevin is out of the office this week, so this'll have to wait till > >> next week. > > > > No, he's back since Tuesday - it was last week that he was out. I > > spoke with him yesterday about this and he indicated that he had been > > thinking about it and had several ideas about how to fix it. I'm not > > sure why he hasn't posted here yet. > > I have been looking at several possible fixes, and weighing the > pros and cons of each. I expect to post a patch later today.
This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.ga447...@tornado.leadboat.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
