On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm coming to the conclusion that the only thing that will make this > materially better in the long run is automatic enforcement of a convention > about what role names may be created in the regression tests. See my > response to Stephen just now for a concrete proposal.
We could also do this by loading a C module during the regression tests, which seems maybe less ugly than adding a GUC. I don't particularly like your suggestion of spooky action at a distance between force_parallel_mode and regression_test_mode. That just seems kooky. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
