Thank you. Yes when I correctly created the table (so avoiding insertion statement error), the memory usage went no higher than ~ 60MB.
Is this a bug from your point of view? -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Unexpected-memory-usage-for-repeated-inserts-within-plpgsql-function-tp5912833p5913022.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
