On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I looked into the problem reported in bug #14265, > attached is a proposed patch that fixes this bug > this would require an initdb because it changes the > representation of stored rules for cases like this, So pg_upgrade would not work at all for the version this goes into, or do you see us testing for such cases and allowing pg_upgrade if none are found? Or do you see a way to allow pg_upgrade in the face of such stored rules? -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
