On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Yeah. Actually, consistent with the above, I discovered that as long > as we consult both the active snapshot stack and the pairingheap of > registered snapshots, it seems to be fine to just insist that we > always get a snapshot back from the snapmgr and use that to initialize > the TOAST snapshot. So I did it that way in the attached version. > > New patch attached. >
Code looks good to me. I have not tested the patch. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
