On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:57:35AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 8/2/16 12:51 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > Yes, that's a strong argument for using a space. I have adjusted the >> > patch to use spaces in all reasonable places. Patch attached, which I >> > have gzipped because it was 133 KB. (Ah, see what I did there?) :-) >> > >> > I am thinking of leaving the 9.6 docs alone as I have already made them >> > consistent (no space) with minimal changes. We can make it consistent >> > the other way in PG 10. >> >> I don't think anyone wanted to *remove* the spaces in the documentation. >> I think this change makes the documentation harder to read. > > Well, we had spaces in only a few places in the docs, and as I said, it > is not consistent. Do you want those few put back for 9.6?
+1 for that. I can't see how it's good for 10 to be one way, 9.6 to be the opposite way, and 9.5 and prior to be someplace in the middle. That seems like a back-patching mess. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
