On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
> These could be limited to being testable only on a specified index, and > not AM-wide: > predicate_locks (? maybe) That one seems like it should either be at the AM level or not included at all. Where it would be interesting to know is if you are a hacker looking for an AM to enhance with support, or (when there is more than just btree supported, so it is not so easy to remember) if you are a DBA investigating a high rate of serialization failures and want to know whether indexes of a certain type have index-relation predicate locking granularity or something more fine-grained. The latter use case seems plausible once there is more of a mix of support among the AMs. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
