On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> /* only needed in OS X 10.1 and possibly early 10.2 releases */ >> Maybe it's time to let it go? > > One part of me says it's not hurting anything, but another part > says that if it were broken we wouldn't know. And it looks like > we can drop that whole subdirectory if we kill it, so let's.
I've discovered that when I build the source tree with coverage enabled, the fact that that directory ends up containing a .o file with no code in it breaks things. This is no doubt a bug in some part of the code coverage toolchain, but all the same I'll be happy if that file can go away. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
