On 16 August 2016 at 19:46, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2016-08-15 12:02:18 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> Thanks for taking a stab at this. I'd like to throw out a few concerns. >> >> One, I'm worried that adding an additional layer of pointer-jumping is >> going to slow things down and make Andres' work to speed up the >> executor more difficult. I don't know that there is a problem there, >> and if there is a problem I don't know what to do about it, but I >> think it's something we need to consider. > > I'm quite concerned about that as well.
This objection would apply to all other proposals as well, FDW etc.. Do you see some way to add flexibility yet without adding a branch point in the code? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
