On 08/18/2016 09:42 PM, Christian Convey wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for that information. > > Is there some document I can read that explains which platform > versions (e.g., OpenBSD 5.3) are considered strongly supported?
well not sure we have very clear document on that - I would say that the buildfarm is the most authoritative answer to that. So I think skimming the buildfarm for the oldest and strangest platforms would be a good start. > > I ask because I'm curious if/how someone in Yury's situation could > predict which minimum version of CMake must be supported in order for > his patch to be accepted. (And if he accepts my offer to pitch in, > I'll actually need that particular detail.) well I personally think the level to meet would be that all the systems on the buildfarm that can build -HEAD at the time the patch is proposed for a commit should be able to build using the new system with whatever cmake version is available in those by default (if it is at all). Stefan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
