On 20/08/2016 15:41, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> If we want to specifically name the recovery_target_lsn in the message, we >> could probably do it using context. > > So that would be basically assigning error_context_stack for each item > parsed for recovery.conf? That seems a bit narrow as usually > recovery.conf is not that long.. >
That'd still be an improvement, since the error message doesn't even mention that the error comes from recovery.conf. I agree it can't come from many places, but it may be useful for some people. -- Julien Rouhaud http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
