On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote: > I haven't looked at the patch, but offhand I wonder if it's worth > considering control characters added by unicode, if you haven't already.
There is no need to put restrictions on those I think, and they are actually supported. Look for example at pg_upgrade/test.sh, we are already testing them with database names :) Not BEL of course, but that works. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
