On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:42:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 03:27:01PM +1000, Paul L Daniels wrote: > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-11/msg00486.php > > The mechanism I described in the above-referenced message only occurs > for nailed-in-cache system tables. Given Daniels' report (and one or
And for ones that have been truncated? I found this reference: <http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=200301251026.14193.mallah%40trade-india.com&rnum=5&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DUninitialized%2Bpage%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.*%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D200301251026.14193.mallah%2540trade-india.com%26rnum%3D5> (Sorry about the long line. I'm still having no luck with archives.postgresql.org). A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
