On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:21:33PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > If we do have the pain of change, should we also consider making WAL > files variable length? What do we gain by having the files all the > same size? ISTM better to have WAL files that vary in length up to 1GB > in size. > > (This is all about XLOG_SEG_SIZE; I presume XLOG_BLCKSZ can stay as it > is, right?)
I think having WAL use variable length files would add complexity for recycling WAL files. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
