On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40:06PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote: >> > time instead of requiring a recompile; we probably don't save any >> > significant number of cycles by compiling this into the server. >> >> FWIW, +1 >> >> We're already hurt by the small segments due to a similar phenomenon >> as the ssh case: TCP slow start. Designing the archive/recovery >> command to work around TCP slow start is quite complex, and bigger >> segments would just be a better thing. >> >> Not to mention that bigger segments compress better. > > This would be good time to rename pg_xlog and pg_clog directories too.
That would be an excellent timing to do so. The first CF is close by, and such a change would be better at the beginning of the development cycle. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
