On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> > Can you split the new xlog-related stuff to a new file, say hash_xlog.h,
>> > instead of cramming it in hash.h?  Removing the existing #include
>> > "xlogreader.h" from hash.h would be nice.  I volunteer for pushing any
>> > preliminary header cleanup commits.
>>
>> So, what you are expecting here is that we create hash_xlog.h and move
>> necessary functions like hash_redo(), hash_desc() and hash_identify()
>> to it. Then do whatever else is required to build it successfully.
>> Once that is done, I can build my patches on top of it.  Is that
>> right?  If yes, I can work on it.
>
> Yes, thanks.
>

How about attached?  If you want, I think we can one step further and
move hash_redo to a new file hash_xlog.c which is required for main
patch, but we can leave it for later as well.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: add_hash_xlog-v1.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to