On 26-08-2016 14:03, David Fetter wrote: > Would these make sense as pg_ctl options, or are you separating them > out because they're not instance-wide? If separating them is > important on those grounds, how about something like pg_db or > pg_db_command? > It doesn't make sense because pg_ctl is server-side and pg_command would be client-side.
>> pg_oid2name: I don't have a strong opinion that it fits in pg_command; > > I vaguely knew that this existed, but I can't recall having heard of > anybody actually using it. I suppose it's under pg_ctl if the split > above between instance-wide and db-specific holds. > I don't use it for a long time. It also a client-side binary then better place for it is pg_command. BTW, is anybody using it? If so, we could add this functionality to psql and remove it. -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
