On 2016-08-26 17:31:14 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I agree with all that. But the subject line is specifically about > moving pg_xlog. So if your opinion is that we shouldn't move pg_xlog, > then that is noted. But if we were to move it, we can think about a > good place to move it to.
I think it's probably worth moving pg_xlog, because the benefit also includes preventing a few users from shooting themselves somewhere vital. That's imo much less the case for some of the other moves. But I still don't think think a largescale reorganization is a good idea, it'll just stall and nothing will happen. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
