On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> On 8/26/16 4:08 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > >> Splitting of ephemeral data seems to have a benefit, the rest seems more >> like rather noisy busywork to me. >> > > People accidentally blowing away pg_clog or pg_xlog is a pretty common > occurrence, and I don't think there's all that many tools that reference > them. I think it's well worth renaming them. > Pretty sure every single backup tool or script out there is referencing pg_xlog. If it's not, then it's broken... pg_clog is a different story of course. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
