On 30 Aug 2016 9:07 AM, "Dave Cramer" <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > > > On 29 August 2016 at 15:42, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> writes: >> > Regarding Java, for anything above the driver itself the >> > JDBC API says the DatabaseMetaData class must implement these >> > methods: >> > ... >> > That *should* make it just a problem for the driver itself. That >> > seems simple enough until you check what those methods have been >> > returning so far. >> >> Seems like we just make getDatabaseMinorVersion() return zero for >> any major >= 10. That might not have been the best thing to do in >> a green field, but given the precedent ... >> >> regards, tom lane >> >> > seems to me that it should report 10 for the major and whatever comes after the . for the minor ?
IMO it just needs to be consistent with the numeric version we report elsewhere - PG_VERSION_NUM, server_version_num etc. > > Dave Cramer > > da...@postgresintl.com > www.postgresintl.com >
