Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm, StartupXLOG seems like a pretty random place to check that, especially
>> since doing it there requires an extra stat() call. Why didn't you just
>> make readRecoveryCommandFile() error out?
> Well, the idea is to do the check before doing anything on PGDATA and
> leave it intact, particularly the post-crash fsync().
I don't see anything very exciting between the beginning of StartupXLOG
and readRecoveryCommandFile. In particular, doing the fsync seems like
a perfectly harmless and maybe-good thing. If there were some operation
with potentially bad side-effects in that range, it would be dangerous
anyway because of the risk of readRecoveryCommandFile erroring out due
to invalid contents of recovery.conf.
This might be an argument for re-ordering what we're doing in StartupXLOG,
but that seems like an independent discussion.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
