> On 31 Aug 2016, at 15:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: >> When SSL renegotiation was removed in 426746b9 the only consumer of the >> openssl >> specific count member in the Port struct was removed, but the member was left >> together with a few updates to it which are unused. Attached patch removes >> the >> leftovers which now serves no purpose unless I’m missing something. > > Hm, well, we can't remove those case labels as control would then end > up in the default case which throws an error.
Doh, I’ll go stand in the corner. > But otherwise this seems > sound. Without renegotiation the count is not very useful anyway > since it's likely to overflow (at least if long is 32 bits). Yeah. Thanks for applying. cheers ./daniel -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
