On August 31, 2016 3:06:23 PM PDT, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote:
>In other painfully pedantic news, I should point out that >sizeof(size_t) isn't necessarily word size (the most generic >definition of word size for the architecture), contrary to my reading >of the 0002-* patch comments. I'm mostly talking thinking about x86_64 >here, of course. Uh? -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
